The example below is a constructed hypothetical, built to show how these rules apply in practice. It does not describe any real person or matter.
The illustrative scenario
A small business owner in Faridabad is trying to understand bank account freezes in cyber fraud cases. The legal basis police use to freeze accounts in cyber fraud investigations, and why High Courts currently disagree on its limits.
The question
The question most people in this position want answered is:
Can the police freeze my entire bank account over a cyber fraud complaint, even if I am the victim?
How the general rule applies
BNSS s.106 allows police to seize property, including bank balances, and report the seizure to a Magistrate. BNSS s.107 is a newer provision allowing a Magistrate to order attachment of proceeds of crime, on a police application approved by an officer of SP/CP rank.
High Courts currently take different views on how far police can go without prior Magistrate approval: Kerala, Bombay (Nagpur bench), and Allahabad (Lucknow bench) have taken a more restrictive view, while the Karnataka High Court (13 Aug 2026) has taken a more permissive one.
In most cases, there is, as of the most recent review of this research, no Supreme Court ruling that has settled this disagreement between High Courts.
This is currently unsettled. Different High Courts have taken different views on whether a blanket freeze without Magistrate approval is lawful. Some have held it is not permitted without stating the specific amount or without informing the Magistrate quickly; the Karnataka High Court has taken a more permissive view.
What often gets missed in situations like this
- Assuming the rule is the same everywhere in India — this is genuinely an unsettled, High-Court-split area, so the position can differ by state.
- Not following up after 90 days — the MHA SOP provides for the hold to lift absent a court or restoration order.
- Treating a frozen account as resolved once a complaint is filed — you may still need to actively pursue release through the GRM/MRM portals or the court.
Where this scenario is set (Faridabad)
- The High Court with jurisdiction is the Punjab & Haryana High Court.
- Matters at the district level are generally handled at the Faridabad District & Sessions Court.
- The relevant police authority is the Faridabad Police.
As noted above, this scenario is a constructed illustration used to explain the general rule — it does not describe a real client, case, or outcome.
For the general rules, see Bank Account Freezes in Cyber Fraud Cases: An Unsettled Area, Digital Arrest Scams: How They Work and What the Supreme Court Has Directed, and Where to Report Cyber Fraud: Portals, Helplines, and e-Zero FIR.
If this touches a situation you are dealing with, you are welcome to discuss it in a consultation.
This overview is general information, not legal advice. Procedures and local practice can differ, so a specific review of your matter is advisable before acting.
This page provides general information about the law in India and is not legal advice. For advice on your specific situation, please consult a qualified advocate.

